A Quick Look at the JMA COBE Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly Data

The NASA GISS comparison graph of global surface temperature anomalies that included the Japan Meteorological Agency’s data raised a few eyebrows yesterday.  The JMA data appears to diverge from the GISS, NCDC and UKMO datasets around 2000, with the JMA data flattening as the others continue to climb higher.  It was discussed at Tom Nelson’s blog, at Bishop Hill, at WattsUpWithThat and at TallBloke’s TalkShop, with Tom Nelson first catching the curiosity, I believe. His headline reads, “Uh oh: Warmist Gavin Schmidt points us to a temperature graph that includes Japanese Meteorological Agency data, which shows a significant decline since the late 1990s”. Good catch, Tom.

The JMA global land+sea surface temperature data is not available as a simple time series, but their sea surface temperature anomaly data is. See here. As of today, that data ends in 2011. So we’ll take a look at it.

The JMA global sea surface temperature data is sometimes referred to as COBE at their website and as KOBI at other times. It appears that KOBI is source data and COBE is the finished interpolated product. There’s an overview of the dataset at the JMA website here, and the referenced paper is here, with more information here.  The JMA COBE sea surface temperature dataset is infilled, using optimum interpolation.  That means that the HADSST3 dataset in the following graphs is the only dataset that has not been infilled; that is, the grids without data for a month have been left blank.

Figure 1Figure 1

Let’s start with the satellite-era data on an annual basis. Figure 1 compares the JMA COBE global sea surface temperature anomalies to NOAA’s ERSST.v3b and Reynolds OI.v2 and to the Hadley Centre’s HADISST and HADSST3 datasets.  Looking at the linear trends, the trend of the JMA COBE data is between the trends of the satellite-based HADISST and Reynolds OI.v2 datasets. The HADSST3 data is the outlier.  I’ll examine the reason for that in a future post.  It may be a similar problem associated with the earlier HADSST2 data discussed here and here.

A comparison of the long-term datasets is shown in Figure 2.  The JMA uses base years of 1981-2010, which shifts most of the curve below zero. This doesn’t impact the trends.  It simply dictates where the curves intersect with zero anomaly. The long-term linear trend of the JMA COBE data is between the HADISST trend and the trends of the other two datasets.   We can also see that KOBE data has not been corrected for 1940s discontinuity discussed in the paper Thompson et al (2008) paper A large discontinuity in the mid-twentieth century in observed global-mean surface temperature.

Figure 2Figure 2

In summary, there’s nothing exceptional about the JMA COBE sea surface temperature dataset—and that’s a good thing.

SOURCES

The JMA COBE global sea surface temperature anomalies are available here. And the other sea surface temperature datasets are available at the Monthly Observations webpage at the KNMI Climate Explorer.

THE MANMADE GLOBAL WARMING CHALLENGE

I prepared a new essay about the natural warming of the global oceans.  It was presented in the blog post of the same name The Manmade Global Warming Challenge. The full essay titled “The Manmade Global Warming Challenge” is here (42MB). And the introduction is here (4MB).

SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE AND OCEAN HEAT CONTENT DATA INDICATE THEY WARMED NATURALLY

I’ve searched sea surface temperature records and ocean heat content data for more than 4 years (more than 3 years for the ocean heat content data), and I can find no evidence of an anthropogenic global warming signal. That is, the data indicate the warming of the global oceans was caused by Mother Nature, not anthropogenic greenhouse gases.

I’ve recently published my e-book (pdf) about the phenomena called El Niño and La Niña. It’s titled Who Turned on the Heat? with the subtitle The Unsuspected Global Warming Culprit, El Niño Southern Oscillation. It is intended for persons (with or without technical backgrounds) interested in learning about El Niño and La Niña events and in understanding the natural causes of the warming of our global oceans for the past 31 years. Because land surface air temperatures simply mimic and exaggerate the natural warming of the global oceans over annual and multidecadal time periods, the vast majority of the warming taking place on land is natural as well. The book is the product of years of research of the ocean heat content data and satellite-era sea surface temperature data that’s available to the public via the internet. It presents how the data accounts for its warming—and there are no indications the warming was caused by manmade greenhouse gases. None at all.

Who Turned on the Heat? was introduced in the blog post Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about El Niño and La Niña… …Well Just about Everything. The Updated Free Preview includes the Table of Contents; the Introduction; the beginning of Section 1, with the cartoon-like illustrations; the discussion About the Cover; and the Closing.

Please buy a copy. Credit/Debit Card through PayPal. You do NOT need to open a PayPal account. Simply scroll down to the “Don’t Have a PayPal Account” purchase option. It’s only US$8.00.

About these ads

About Bob Tisdale

Research interest: the long-term aftereffects of El Niño and La Nina events on global sea surface temperature and ocean heat content. Author of the ebook Who Turned on the Heat? and regular contributor at WattsUpWithThat.
This entry was posted in SST Dataset Info. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s