>The Barents and Bering Seas

>BARENTS SEA

It seems that each time I see an SST anomaly map there’s a hot spot north of Scandinavia in the Barents Sea. Refer to Figure 1.

http://i37.tinypic.com/2ld80ty.jpg
Figure 1

Figure 2 illustrates the Barents Sea SST anomalies from January 1854 to May 2008, smoothed with an 85-month filter. With the possible exception of ENSO, the amplitude and frequency of the SST modulations are greater than any other SST data set I’ve downloaded and graphed so far, especially with what is essentially a 7-year filter. Is the decrease in amplitude before 1930 a function of the smoothing they apply in periods of reduced samples? Or does the increase in amplitude after 1930 result from a reduction in Arctic sea ice?
http://i35.tinypic.com/25jz479.jpg
Figure 2

Figures 3 and 4 show a decrease in summer, spring, and annual Arctic ice extent since the 1950s. For the winter and autumn sea ice extent, the declines began in the 1970s and 80s. (For those concerned about the “hockey stick” appearance of these graphs, sea ice extent is limited my North Atlantic and North Pacific Ocean currents. These graphs do not illustrate ice thickness.) Assuming that some of the sea ice loss was in and around the Barents Sea, would less sea ice there have allowed larger variations in SSTs?
http://i36.tinypic.com/vdpvd4.jpg
Figure 3

http://i37.tinypic.com/ogatd3.jpg
Figure 4

Is this confirmed by the fact that in recent years, the Arctic Oscillation (AO) appears to have had more of an impact? Refer to Figures 5 and 6. Like the Barents Sea SST anomalies, the AO has changed its amplitude after 1950 as well. And it appears as though, as time progresses, Barents Sea SST responds more to a change in the AO. Is this also a function of continued sea ice loss, or did other influences, such as ENSO and the AMO, cause the difference? (I will not be comparing ENSO and AMO in this post.)
http://i37.tinypic.com/2hn3jpu.jpg
Figure 5

http://i38.tinypic.com/11waii8.jpg
Figure 6

BERING SEA

On the Pacific Ocean side of the Bering Strait lies the Bering Sea. Figure 7 illustrates its SST anomalies smoothed with an 85-month filter. The amplitude of the oscillation is remarkable.
http://i37.tinypic.com/28hlvcz.jpg
Figure 7

As shown in Figure 8, the Bering Sea SST anomalies follow the general trends of the North Pacific.
http://i36.tinypic.com/30jpb4n.jpg
Figure 8

But they also contain a varying portion of ENSO. Refer to Figure 9.
http://i35.tinypic.com/ir0tbt.jpg
Figure 9

DATA SOURCES

AMO Data (1899 to 2002)
http://ao.atmos.colostate.edu/Data/AO_TREN_NCEP_Jan1899Current.ascii

AMO (1950 to 2007)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/monthly.ao.index.b50.current.ascii.table

HISTORIC SEA ICE DATA
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/SEAICE/
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/SEAICE/timeseries.1870-2007

SST DATA
Data is Smith and Reynolds Extended Reconstructed SST (ERSST.v2) available through the NOAA National Operational Model Archive & Distribution System (NOMADS).
http://nomads.ncdc.noaa.gov/#climatencdc

About Bob Tisdale

Research interest: the long-term aftereffects of El Niño and La Nina events on global sea surface temperature and ocean heat content. Author of the ebook Who Turned on the Heat? and regular contributor at WattsUpWithThat.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s