This post provides an update of many of the ENSO-related variables we presented as part of last year’s 2014-15 El Niño Series. The reference years for comparison graphs in this post are 1997 and 2014, which are the development years of the strongest recent El Niño and the last El Niño. I have not included animations in this post. In their place, I’ve compared present-day maps from the NOAA GODAS website to the same time in 2014.
Note: In addition to the standard time-series presentations of global, NINO3.4, hemispheric and ocean basin sea surface temperature anomalies, I’ve also added an updated graph of the sea surface temperature anomalies for The Blob to the standard format of the monthly sea surface temperature updates at my website.
INTRODUCTION – NINO3.4 SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE ANOMALIES ARE AT THE 1.5 DEG C THRESHOLD OF A STRONG EL NIÑO
NOAA defines a Strong El Niño as: “Episode when the peak Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) is greater than or equal to 1.5°C.” (See the footnotes of the NOAA ENSO blog post here.) And NOAA’s Oceanic Niño Index is a three-month running average of NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies.
Weekly NINO3.4 sea surface temperatures for the week centered on July 8, 2015 are at 1.5 Deg C, the threshold a strong El Niño. Of course, the running average of the monthly NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies would have to remain at or above that threshold for a number of months in order to register as a strong El Niño on NOAA’s Oceanic NINO Index.
Figure 0
Sea surfaces for the NINO regions east of the NINO3.4 region are warmer. In fact, last week, the anomalies in the NINO1+2 region had risen sharply and are now above 3.0 Deg C, reminding us we’re seeing an East Pacific El Niño, not an El Niño Modoki (Central Pacific El Niño).
ENSO METRIC UPDATES
This post provides an update on the progress of the evolution of the 2015/16 El Niño (assuming one continues into next year) with monthly data through the end of June 2015, and for the weekly data through early July. The post is similar in layout to the updates that were part of the 2014/15 El Niño series of posts here. The post includes 17 illustrations so it might take a few moments to load on your browser. Please click on the illustrations to enlarge them.
Included are updates of the weekly sea surface temperature anomalies for the four most-often-used NINO regions. Also included are a couple of graphs of the monthly BOM Southern-Oscillation Index (SOI) and the NOAA Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI).
For the comparison graphs we’re using the El Niño evolution years of 1997 and 2014 (a very strong El Niño and the last El Niño) as references for 2015. The 1997/98 El Niño was extremely strong, while the 2014/15 event was extremely weak and intermittent.
And since there is another downwelling (warm) Kelvin wave making its way east along the equator in the Pacific, also included in this post are evolution comparisons using warm water volume anomalies and depth-averaged temperature anomalies from the NOAA TOA project website.
Then, we’ll take a look at a number of Hovmoller diagrams comparing the progress so far this year to what happened in both 1997 and 2014.
Last, we’ll compare maps and cross sections (2014 and 2015) from the GODAS website of a number of ENSO-related metrics.
NINO REGION TIME-SERIES GRAPHS
Note: The weekly NINO region sea surface temperature anomaly data for Figures 1 and 2 are from the NOAA/CPC Monthly Atmospheric & SST Indices webpage, specifically the data here. The base years for anomalies for the NOAA/CPC data are referenced to 1981-2010.
Figure 1 includes the weekly sea surface temperature anomalies of the 4 most-often-used NINO regions of the equatorial Pacific. From west to east they include:
- NINO4 (5S-5N, 160E-150W)
- NINO3.4 (5S-5N, 170W-120W)
- NINO3 (5S-5N, 150W-90W)
- NINO1+2 (10S-0, 90W-80W)
As of the week centered on July 8, 2015, the sea surface temperature anomalies for the NINO1+2 region were about 3.3 deg C, the highest they’ve been since the 1997/98 El Niño. And NINO3 region anomalies are at 2.1 deg C. Again, it looks like an East Pacific El Niño this year. They’re typically stronger than Central Pacific El Niños, a.k.a. El Niño Modoki.
Figure 1
Note that the horizontal red lines in the graphs are the present readings, not the trends.
EL NIÑO EVOLUTION COMPARISONS FOR NINO REGION SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE ANOMALIES
Using weekly sea surface temperature anomalies for the four NINO regions, Figure 2 compares the goings on this year with the 1997/98 and 2014/15 events. All of the NINO regions this year are warmer than during the same times of the 2014/15 El Niño, and, while the NINO1+2 is lagging slightly behind the 1997/98 El Niño, the other regions are comparable to or warmer than the 1997/98 El Niño. Then again, we started this year in weak El Niño conditions, while we didn’t during the two reference years.
Figure 2
THE MULTIVARIATE ENSO INDEX
The Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI) is another ENSO index published by NOAA. It was created and is maintained by NOAA’s Klaus Wolter. The Multivariate ENSO Index uses the sea surface temperatures of the NINO3 region of the equatorial Pacific, along with a slew of atmospheric variables…thus “multivariate”.
According to the most recent Multivariate ENSO Index update discussion, strong El Niño conditions exist:
The updated (May-June) MEI has risen by 0.49 standard deviations in one month to +2.06, to reach the 3rd highest ranking above the ‘strong’ El Niño threshold possible (upper 10%ile). This is also the highest MEI value in more than 17 years, surpassing the peak of the 2009-10 El Niño by more than 0.5 standard deviations. The current El Niño has ranked above the weak El Niño threshold for five months in a row, and above the strong threshold for three months running. Thus, it has become the first El Niño event since 1997-98 with at least three months registering in the upper 10%ile.
There’s something else to consider about the MEI. El Niño and La Niña rankings according to the MEI aren’t based on fixed threshold values such as +0.5 for El Niño and -0.5 for La Niña. The MEI El Niño and La Niña rankings are based on percentiles, top 30% for the weak to strong El Niños and the bottom 30% for the weak to strong La Niñas. This is difficult to track, because, when using the percentile method, the thresholds of El Niño and La Niña conditions vary from one bimonthly period to the next, and they can change from year to year.
The Multivariate ENSO Index update discussion and data for May/June were posted back on July 10th. Figure 3 presents a graph of the MEI time series starting in Dec/Jan 1979. And Figure 4 compares the evolution this year to the reference El Niño-formation years of 1997 and 2014.
Figure 3
# # #
Figure 4
EL NIÑO EVOLUTION COMPARISONS WITH TAO PROJECT SUBSURFACE DATA
The NOAA Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean (TAO) Project website includes data for two temperature-related datasets for the waters below the equatorial Pacific. See their Upper Ocean Heat Content and ENSO webpage for descriptions of the datasets. The two datasets are Warm Water Volume (above the 20 deg C isotherm) and the Depth-Averaged Temperatures for the top 300 meters (aka T300). Both are available for the:
- Western Equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 120E-155W)
- Eastern Equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 155W-80W)
- Total Equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 120E-80W)
Keep in mind that the longitudes of 120E-80W stretch 160 deg, almost halfway around the globe. For a reminder of width of the equatorial Pacific, see the protractor-based illustration here.
In the following three illustrations, we’re comparing data for the evolution of the 2015/16 “season” so far (through month-to-date July 2015) with the data for the evolutions of the 1997/98 and 2014/15 El Niños. The Warm Water Volume data are the top graphs and the depth-averaged temperature data are the bottom graphs. As you’ll see, the curves of two datasets are similar, but not necessarily the same.
Let’s start with the Western Equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 120E-155W), Figure 5. The warm water volume and depth-averaged temperature anomalies show the Western Equatorial Pacific began 2015 with noticeably less warm water than during the opening months of 1997 and 2014. Both western equatorial datasets now, though, are higher than in 2014 but less than 1997.
Figure 5
Both warm water volume and depth-averaged temperature anomalies in the Eastern equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 155W-80W) have fallen behind the values of 1997, but are greater than the 2014 values. See Figure 6.
Figure 6
The total of the TAO Project eastern and western equatorial subsurface temperature-related data, Figure 7, are as one would expect looking at the subsets. Warm water volume and depth-averaged temperature anomalies in 2015 are higher than they were in 2014, but lower than they were in 1997.
Figure 7
SOUTHERN OSCILLATION INDEX (SOI)
The Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) from Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology is another widely used reference for the strength, frequency and duration of El Niño and La Niña events. We discussed the Southern Oscillation Index in Part 8 of the 2014/15 El Niño series. It is derived from the sea level pressures of Tahiti and Darwin, Australia, and as such it reflects the wind patterns off the equator in the southern tropical Pacific. With the Southern Oscillation Index, El Niño events are strong negative values and La Niñas are strong positive values, which is the reverse of what we see with sea surface temperatures. The June 2015 Southern Oscillation Index value is -12.0, which is a greater negative value than the threshold of El Niño conditions. (The BOM threshold for El Niño conditions is an SOI value of -8.0.) Figure 8 presents a time-series graph of the SOI data. Note that the horizontal red line is the present monthly value, not a trend line.
Figure 8
The graphs in Figure 9 compare the evolution of the SOI values this year to those in 1997 and 2014…the development years of the 1997/98 and 2014/15 El Niños. The top graph shows the raw data. Because the SOI data are so volatile, I’ve smoothed them with 3-month filters in the bottom graph. Referring to the smoothed data, the Southern Oscillation Index this year is ahead of the values in 2014, but behind 1997.
Figure 9
Also see the BOM Recent (preliminary) Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) values webpage. For the past week (through July 14), SOI values had started closer to “normal”, after reaching into the -40s earlier in the past 30 days. But they have worked their way more negative again in recent days. The current 30-day running average is a greater negative value than the -8.0 threshold of an El Niño based on the Southern Oscillation Index, as is the 90-day average.
COMPARISONS OF HOVMOLLER DIAGRAMS OF THIS YEAR (TO DATE) WITH 1997 AND 2014
NOTE: The NOAA GODAS website has not yet added 2015 to their drop-down menu for Hovmoller diagrams. For the following illustrations, I’ve used the Hovmolller diagrams available for the past 12 months, deleted the 2014 date and aligned the 2015 data with the other 2 years.
Hovmoller diagrams are a great way to display data. If they’re new to you, there’s no reason to be intimidated by them. Let’s take a look at Figure 10. It presents the Hovmoller diagrams of thermocline depth anomalies (the depth of the isotherm at 20 deg C. Water warmer than 20 deg C is above the 20 deg C isotherm and below it the water is cooler). 2015 is in the center, 1997 on the left and 2014 to the right. (Sorry about the different sizes of the Hovmollers, but somewhere along the line NOAA GODAS changed them, but they are scaled, color-coded, the same.)
The vertical (y) axis in all the Hovmollers shown in this post is time with the Januarys at the top and Decembers at the bottom. The horizontal (x) axis is longitude, so, moving from left to right in each of the three Hovmoller diagrams, we’re going from west to east…with the Indian Ocean in the left-hand portion, the Pacific in the center and the Atlantic in the right-hand portion. We’re interested in the Pacific. The data are color-coded according to the scales below the Hovmollers.
Figure 10
Figure 10 is presenting the depth of the 20 deg C isotherm along a band from 2S to 2N. The positive anomalies, working their way eastward early in 1997, 2014 and 2015, were caused by downwelling Kelvin waves, which push down on the thermocline (the 20 deg C isotherm). You’ll note how, each year, the anomalies grew in strength as the Kelvin wave migrated east. That does not mean the Kelvin wave is getting stronger as it traveled east; that simply indicates that the thermocline is normally closer to the surface in the eastern equatorial Pacific than it is in the western portion.
The El Niño conditions were much stronger in 1997 than they were in 2014 and so far in 2015.
An upwelling (cool) Kelvin wave followed the initial downwelling (warm) Kelvin wave in 2014 and suppressed the development of the El Niño last year. So far that has not happened in 2015.
Figure 11 presents the 2015-to-date along with the 1997 and 2014 Hovmollers for wind stress (not anomalies) along the equator. The simplest way to explain them is that they’re presenting the impacts of the strengths and directions of the trade winds on the surfaces of the equatorial oceans. In this presentation, the effects of the east to west trade winds at various strengths are shown in blues, and the reversals of the trade winds into westerlies are shown in yellows, oranges and reds. To explain the color coding, the trade winds normally blow from east to west; thus the cooler colors for stronger than normal east to west trade winds. The reversals of the trade winds (the yellows, oranges and reds) are the true anomalies and they’re associated with El Niños, which are the anomalous state of the tropical Pacific. (A La Niña is simply an exaggerated normal state.)
Figure 11
The two westerly wind bursts shown in red in the western equatorial Pacific in 2014 are associated with the strong downwelling Kelvin wave that formed at the time. (See the post ENSO Basics: Westerly Wind Bursts Initiate an El Niño.) Same thing with the three westerly wind bursts early in 2015 (January through March: they initiated the Kelvin wave this year. Throughout 1997, there was a series of westerly wind bursts in the western equatorial Pacific. We didn’t see the additional westerly wind bursts later in 2014, which suppressed the evolution of the 2014/15 El Niño. The most recent westerly wind burst happened in late-June/early-July of 2015 and helped to strengthen the El Niño this year.
We’ll need more westerly wind bursts this year, too, in order for this El Niño to continue to develop throughout the year.
Figure 12 presents the Hovmollers of wind stress anomalies…just a different perspective. But positive wind stress anomalies, at the low end of the color-coded scale, are actually a weakening of the trade winds, not necessarily a reversal.
Figure 12
NOTE: There are a number of wind stress-related images on meteorological websites. Always check to see if they’re presenting absolute values or anomalies.
And Figure 13 presents the Hovmollers of sea surface temperature anomalies. Unfortunately, the Hovmoller of sea surface temperature anomalies is delayed a few weeks at the GODAS website. Refer again, also, to the comparison graphs in Figure 2.
Figure 13
Notice how warm the eastern equatorial Pacific got during the evolution of the 1997/98 El Niño. While the sea surface temperatures this year have reached the threshold of a strong El Niño, they’ve still got a lot of work to do to reach the strength of the 1997/98 El Niño.
GODAS MAPS AND CROSS SECTIONS – EARLY JULY 2014 AND 2015
As opposed to presenting animations from NOAA’s GODAS website of maps and cross sections of a number of metrics as I did in the 2014/15 El Niño series, I thought it would be better (more informative) to compare the most recent maps and cross sections from this year to those from the same time last year. So let’s start with the cross sections of temperature anomalies along the equator.
Figure 14 compares the subsurface temperature anomalies along the equator (2S-2N) for the pentads (5-day averages) centered on July 7, 2015 (left) and July 7, 2014 (right). The equatorial Indian Ocean is to the left in both Illustrations and the equatorial Atlantic is to the right. We’re interested in the equatorial Pacific in the center. The illustrations confirm what was shown in the depth-averaged temperature anomaly graphs in Figures 5 and 6. The subsurface temperature anomalies in the western equatorial Pacific are cooler this year than last, but in the eastern equatorial Pacific, they’re warmer this year. By July 2014, an upwelling (cool) Kelvin wave had traveled east and lowered the subsurface temperature anomalies along the equatorial Pacific.
Figure 14
Figure 15 presents global maps of the depth-averaged temperature anomalies to depths of 300 meters (a.k.a. T300 anomalies). Looking at the tropical Pacific as a whole, not just the equator, the downwelling Kelvin wave this year has definitely reached the shores of South America. This year’s Kelvin wave has traveled eastward into an eastern tropical Pacific that’s warmer than last year, a product of the additional downwelling (warm) Kelvin waves later in 2014. Keep in mind, though, that the downwelling (warm) Kelvin wave this year started later than in 2014 and that there was an upwelling (cool) Kelvin wave last year by this time that suppressed it. Also note that the western tropical Pacific is much cooler this year than last. Are those cool anomalies in the west setting up for a strong La Niña next year? We’ll have to wait and watch.
Figure 15
Sea surface height anomalies, Figure 16, are often used as a proxy for temperature anomalies from the surface to the ocean floor. They are showing lower sea levels in the western tropical Pacific this year than last and showing that the downwelling Kelvin wave has arrived in a warmer eastern tropical Pacific.
Figure 16
The sea surface temperature anomaly maps at the GODAS website lag by a few weeks. Figure 17 shows the sea surface temperature anomaly maps for 2014 and 2015 for the pentads centered on July 2nd. The sea surface temperature anomalies along the equatorial Pacific are warmer this year than last, concentrated this year just east and west of the dateline. The eastern North Pacific is also warmer this year, with the remnants of “The Blob” and the coastally trapped Kelvin wave(s) from last year.
Figure 17
Let’s hope a very strong La Niña follows the El Niño this year and finally overcomes the effects of the “blob” on the North Pacific. Even then, there may have been an upward shift in sea surface temperatures there, which would impact the entire east Pacific. We’ll have to keep an eye on it over the next few years.
I’ll provide an update on The Blob in a few days. It’s stronger than last year.
EL NIÑO REFERENCE POSTS
For additional introductory discussions of El Niño processes see:
- An Illustrated Introduction to the Basic Processes that Drive El Niño and La Niña Events
- El Niño and La Niña Basics: Introduction to the Pacific Trade Winds
- La Niñas Do NOT Suck Heat from the Atmosphere
- ENSO Basics: Westerly Wind Bursts Initiate an El Niño
Also see the entire 2014-15 El Niño series. We discussed a wide-range of topics in those posts.
WANT TO LEARN MORE ABOUT EL NIÑO EVENTS AND THEIR AFTEREFFECTS?
Or, yay, a commercial!
My ebook Who Turned on the Heat? goes into a tremendous amount of detail to explain El Niño and La Niña processes and the long-term aftereffects of strong El Niño events. Who Turned on the Heat? weighs in at a whopping 550+ pages, about 110,000+ words. It contains somewhere in the neighborhood of 380 color illustrations. In pdf form, it’s about 23MB. It includes links to more than a dozen animations, which allow the reader to view ENSO processes and the interactions between variables.
Last year, I lowered the price of Who Turned on the Heat? from U.S.$8.00 to U.S.$5.00. And the book sold well.
A free preview in pdf format is here. The preview includes the Table of Contents, the Introduction, the first half of section 1 (which was provided complete in the post here), a discussion of the cover, and the Closing. Take a run through the Table of Contents. It is a very-detailed and well-illustrated book—using data from the real world, not models of a virtual world. Who Turned on the Heat? is only available in pdf format…and will only be available in that format. Click here to purchase a copy.
My sincerest thanks to everyone who has purchased a copy of Who Turned on the Heat? as a result of the 2014-15 El Nino series.
Bob Tisdale - Climate Observations 
Pingback: Kalter Nordatlantik und El Niño mit Folgen: Schwache Hurrikansaison – Kühler Sommer 2015 in Mitteleuropa? | wobleibtdieglobaleerwaermung
Hi Bob,
after strong El Niños like 1987/88 and 1997/98 there always followed a strong La Niña with the MEI data: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei/comp.png
My guess with 80% probability: La Niña will start in 2016…: https://wobleibtdieglobaleerwaermung.wordpress.com/2015/05/29/globale-abkuhlung-la-nina-2016-in-sicht/
Cheers
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.
schneefan2015, let’s hope the La Nina is strong enough to kill The Blob.
A very comprehensive report on the actual state of a major climate driver: El Nino. Thanks for your efforts, Bob.
Bob, the cold water – let’s call it “Blip” – in the West and Central North Pacific seems to move eastward to the US-Eastcoast until 2016 and will kill “The Blop”… http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.gif …, and the IPWP is discharged cool…
Hi Bob, please correct my fault: US-Westcoast, not US-Eastcoast.
Thanks
Thanks, Bob.
The data is telling the long story of this El Niño, next year it will be different.
While I like using analog years as a way to predict possible outcomes of current ENSO conditions (such as used in our Oregon version of ENSO updates), my one criticism is that it is a bit too much wriggle matching and not enough consideration given to how much stored energy is available to spread across the equatorial band under El Nino conditions. I would rather consideration be given to choosing analog El Nino’s that appeared after similar La Nina conditions under similar El Nino oscillation conditions.
Click to access dlongrange.pdf
Pingback: ENSO-Prognosen im Sommer 2015: Zwischen Super-El Niño und völligem Ausfall des “Christkinds” | wobleibtdieglobaleerwaermung
Bob, I have noticed a consistent pattern with the CFSv2 mean forecast. It way over-shoots SST’s in the Southern Hemisphere within the equatorial band. I have also noticed a very sharp almost linear southern edge to current observed equatorial band El Nino SST’s versus the ill-defined northern edge. Why are the North and Sound edges so different?
Click to access enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf
Pamela, for example,I assume you’re referring to the differences in the North and South Pacific shown in the graph here:
I can’t give you a firm answer but I let you know what I think it appears to be if you’re interested.
I wonder if it is because of the much stronger gyres in the South compared to the North Pacific. And if the Antarctic Circumpolar Current keeps the gyre colder than those in the North Pacific. But it also makes me wonder why the models make the Southern part of the El Nino areas warmer than observations.
http://education.nationalgeographic.com/encyclopedia/ocean-gyre/
Pamela, for the models, I wonder how many use the 1997/98 El Nino as the standard for a classic event (This is a 12-month average):
And here’s the past 12 months:
The Blob and the Baby Blob off the Baja Peninsula have dominated the past year and set the unusual warm pattern in the North Pacific. But there’s really nothing unusual about the South Pacific pattern (in contrast to the very unusual North Pacific).
Cheers.
The data only goes back to 2006 but I thought you would be interested in this satellite-based solar insolation data set. Notice the decreased insolation along the equatorial band due to current El Nino parameters. I wish they had not used the color pallet chosen for the general public. However white heat is hotter than red heat so for someone who has been around wood fires all her life, this makes sense to me. Also notice the scale only goes up to 500 W/m2, which is less than the clear sky idealized standard of 1000 W/m2. We are not getting all that the Sun has to give us and one can clearly see it is because of atmospheric cloudy conditions, not top of the atmosphere solar irradiance.
http://neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/view.php?datasetId=CERES_INSOL_D&date=2015-06-01
I have found a new and improved monthly discussion that not only includes ENSO information but also looks at all the ocean basins. I much prefer this teleconnected view than the narrowed look at El Nino regions available in the weekly update product.
Here is the link:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/GODAS/
then scroll down to: Monthly Ocean Briefing
then click on current or archive powerpoints or pdf’s.
You get this:
Click to access global_ocean_monitoring_current.pdf
Enjoy
Regarding your wondering, I am betting that because of the abundant data available for all the parameters that set up the 97-98 El Nino, and the fact that the course of that event was also minutely measured, the parameters present before, during, and after that event were likely used to forge dynamical models that mimic that event. They then initialize the resultant model with observed measured of the same recent parameters. So yes, I think you are right about the use of that event in ENSO dynamical models, which could be why so many of them run hot.
The Nino 3.4 volume of warm water appears to be decreasing since ’98. Volume is deduced from the thermocline depth which is usually measured from the top of the sea surface down to the depth of temperature decrease to 20C, the isotherm depth (D20).
This is in addition to the current contraction of anomalous warm water measured in the current El Nino condition that is shown in the monthly discussion I linked to earlier.
Click to access global_ocean_monitoring_current.pdf
These two things combined, an apparent multiple year decrease in warm water volume plus the current contraction in warm water in the Western equatorial area leads me to think this El Nino will not meet or pass by the 97/98 event.
oops. Meant to say the Eastern equatorial area, not the Western equatorial area. My bad.
Thanks for that. I was very interested to read your reports on the connection of El Nino and El Nina to to global temperature trends. For instance here you say frequently CO2 based models leave them out which means they are not very accurate:
Do you know of published papers that show that just using El Nino/El Nina and perhaps also the Atlantic decadel oscillation you can more accurately represent the global temperature without including CO2 effects?
Bob Clark
Hi Bob. I know of no papers that present the contribution of the ENSO-related “Trenberth Jumps” on global surface temperatures. Most treat ENSO as noise…primarily because that’s how they model it.
There are a number of recent papers that discussed the contribution of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on global surface temperatures. I discussed a few in recent years. See the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation category:
https://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/category/atlantic-multidecadal-oscillation/
Pingback: El Nino: Alles wird stürmisch. Das Klima und die Politik - Donner und DoriaDonner und Doria
I wonder if this El Nino, like the 1997-1998 El Nino, will create a large step increase in global temps which will plateau for several years? What is amazing about this year’s El Nino is that the Indian Ocean SSTs are much warmer than in 1997. Cool Indian Ocean SSTs, coupled with cooler than normal SSTs off the east Coast of Australia are important in creating strong Westerly Wind Bursts (WWBs), which can sustain a strong El Nino for many months. This is exactly what happened in 1997.
Additionally, beginning in late June and into July, a near record high amplitude MJO moved into Phase 6 and 7, which enhanced the already strong WWBs across the Central and West Equatorial Pacific. I believe it was this MJO which caused a rapid intensification in this year’s El Nino. The MJO has now moved well into Phase 8, and its effect should be minimal.
It will be interesting to see how this El Nino will pan out. I was a weather forecaster many years ago, and I one thing I learned is that Mother Nature is impossible to pin down. No two weather events are alike, and no 2 El Ninos are alike. The Alarmists currently are basking in glory, as they anticipate a record spike in global temps (A decade ago, they said El Nino was not a driving force in global temps; now they wait in excited anticipation in every Nino event). But, Nature usually has something up her sleeve. Whether there is another La Nina like 1999-2000 is still not clear (there should be one based on what we’ve seen in the past). Additionally, I wonder if there is a teleconnection between the Pacific and North Atlantic? The North Atlantic SSTs have plunged the last 8-10 months; there is an old weather saying, “If one region of the globe is significantly warming, some other region should be cooling. Our atmosphere is always attempting equilibrium.”