THE BLOB Seems to Be Disappearing at the Surface – But Will It Reemerge?

Sad to say, I suspect it may reemerge at the surface…maybe not as strong as in the past, but I don’t think it’s going to disappear completely in 2016.  I hope my suspicions are wrong, though.

NOTE:  This post includes two gif animations so it may take a while to load on your browser.

INTRODUCTION (BOILERPLATE)

We first discussed an unusual hotspot in the sea surface temperature anomalies of the eastern extratropical North Pacific two and a half years ago in the August 2013 post appropriately titled About the Unusual Warming Event in the Extratropical North Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies. That large pocket of elevated sea surface temperatures was later given the nickname “The Blob” by Nick Bond of JISAO.  Since that first post, we’ve discussed it numerous times, along with its impacts on global surface temperatures:

WHAT CAUSED THE BLOB? (BOILERPLATE)

According to Bond et al. (2015) Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific, a persistent ridge of high pressure in the mid-to-high latitudes of the eastern North Pacific (known as the Ridiculously Resilient Ridge) prevented the sea surfaces there from cooling normally. The Ridiculously Resilient Ridge is also responsible for the high temperatures and drought conditions along the west coast of the U.S. in recent years.   See Anthony Watts’s April 2015 post “Warm blob” in Pacific Ocean not caused by climate change, affects U.S. weather at WattsUpWithThat.  It includes the press release for two papers: Bond et al. (2015) Causes and Impacts of the 2014 Warm Anomaly in the NE Pacific and Hartmann (2015) Pacific sea surface temperature and the winter of 2014.

HOWEVER

Let’s examine the animation of sea surface temperature anomalies for the North Pacific, starting in 2007. Animation 1 is an update and expansion of the animation here from the post North Pacific Update: The Blob’s Strengthening Suggests It’s Not Ready to Depart.  (My thanks to blogger Bill Illis for suggesting I extend the animation back in time.)

Animation 1

Animation 1 (You may need to click start it.)

Animations of maps of monthly and weekly sea surface temperature anomalies can be very volatile, with weather effects and seasonal components creating a lot of visual noise.  To minimize the monthly volatility and seasonal components, each of the maps in Animation 1 presents the average sea surface temperature anomalies for a full year.  The annual maps then advance on a monthly basis. That is, the first map covers the 12-month period of January 2007 to December 2007.  The second map is for February 2007 to January 2008.  The third map: March 2007 to February 2008.  And so on through the last map for January 2015 to December 2015. This is similar to smoothing time-series data with a 12-month running-mean filter. I’ve paused the animation and added notes of the timing of El Niño and La Niña events.

We can see that the warm water for The Blob appears to form during the 2010/11 La Niña and that it is then enhanced during the 2011/12 La Niña. That suggests a couple of things:  (1) The warm water for The Blob may have first been released by the 2009/10 El Niño and then spun up east of Japan into the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension (KOE) during the trailing 2010/11 La Niña. Or (2) changes in atmospheric circulation caused by the 2010/11 La Niña caused the warm surface waters to build up along the KOE, which was then enhanced during the 2011/12 La Niña.

When did it that warm pocket of water couple with the ridge of high pressure ? Dunno.

We can also see another Blob-like pocket of warm surface waters forming during what used to be called the 2008/09 La Niña…before NOAA switched to the ERSST.v4 “pause-buster” sea surface temperature data. Maybe a prerequisite for The Blob is a double-dip La Niña…but with a moderately strong El Niño preceding it.

THE BLOB APPEARS TO BE DISAPPEARING AT THE SURFACE

Let’s look at another animation.  We can see The Blob in the eastern extratropical North Pacific appearing to be dissipate in recent months.

Animation 2

Animation 2 (You may need to click start it.)

For Animation 2, I’ve borrowed and annotated the maps from Saturday’s 52-week animation of sea surface temperature anomalies from the NOAA ESRL PSD Map Room Climate Products – Sea Surface Temperature (SST) website, specifically the webpage here.  I’ve noted on the first frame the location and coordinates that NOAA uses for The Blob in their GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing.

We can see that the focus of The Blob shifts location and that it seems to strengthen and weaken over 2015…and that it appears to be dissipating/disappearing in recent weeks.

WHY WOULD THE BLOB REEMERGE AT THE SURFACE?

Mother Nature has once again shown that she can cause ocean heat uptake to depth.  That is, The Blob, a naturally occurring event, created a lot of warm water to depth in that location.  We can still see evidence of this in the most recent NOAA GODAS depth-averaged temperature reanalysis for the depths of 300 meters (a.k.a. T300 anomalies).  See Figure 1. (Map available here.)

Figure 1

Figure 1

An even better illustration:  Figure 2 is page 25 from the NOAA/GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing. It includes two Hovmoller diagrams in the upper left-hand side that show the temperature anomalies to depths of 300 meters: one from 1979 to present and the other for the past 4 years. The temperature scale is difficult to read, but I believe the numbers range from -1.8 deg C to +1.8 deg C.

Figure 2 NOAA Ocean Briefing Pg 25

Figure 2 (Page 25 from NOAA/GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing)

Even though surface temperatures in The Blob region have dropped in recent months, there is still a chunk of warm water below the surface…and it should eventually reemerge at the surface.

The third note on page 25 from the GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing reads:

The development of the enhanced warming in late 2013 seems associated with the switch to positive PDO phase.

But the “enhanced warming in late 2013” precedes the “switch to positive PDO phase”, which didn’t occur until early 2014.   In that case, wouldn’t it be clearer if it were written as, The switch to positive PDO phase seems to be a lagged response to the enhanced warming of The Blob in late 2013?

A COUPLE OF TIME-SERIES GRAPHS

I have switched to the coordinates used in the NOAA/GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing for The Blob, which are 40N-50N, 150W-130W.   I had been using a larger region: 35N-55N, 150W-125W.   The sea surface temperature anomalies of NOAA’s smaller region are a little more volatile than my former region.  See Figure 3.

Figure 3 Blob Time Series Comparison

Figure 3

And Figure 4 includes the time-series and annual evolutions of the sea surface temperatures for the coordinates used by NOAA for The Blob. Based on the weekly maps shown in Animation 2, I suspect we’ll see an even further decline (an anomaly below 1.0 deg C) in the January 2016 sea surface temperature anomalies for that region.  Check back here on the second Monday or Tuesday in February for the January 2016 sea surface temperature update.  The Blob update is near the bottom.  While you’re at it, please add my website to your favorites.  The sea surface temperature updates are not cross-posted at WattsUpWithThat.

Figure 4 New Blob Time Series and Evolution

Figure 4

MODEL FORECASTS FOR THE BLOB

Figure 5 is page 38 from the latest NOAA/GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing (with my highlight) for your info.

Figure 5 - NOAA Ocean Briefing Pg 38

Figure 5 (Page 38 from NOAA/GODAS Monthly Ocean Briefing)

The second note is discussing the forecasts for the sea surface temperatures of the North Atlantic in response to the 2015/16 El Niño, which usually begins in the early part of the decay year of a strong El Niño.

FURTHER READING

For more information about The Blob, see the posts linked at the beginning of this post.

I also discussed and illustrated the blatantly obvious impacts of The Blob on 2014 and 2015 global sea surface temperatures in my free ebook On Global Warming and the Illusion of Control – Part 1 (25MB .pdf).  See General Discussions 2 and 3.  Simply click on those general discussions in the ebook’s Table of Contents. Of course, global sea surface temperatures in 2015 were also strongly impacted by the 2015/16 El Niño, as they will in 2016 with the lagged effects of the El Niño.

UPDATE – SOURCE

Oops. Forgot to state what sea surface temperature datasets were presented in Figures 3 and 4 and for Animation 1. It’s Reynolds OI.v2 sea surface temperature data from the KNMI Climate Explorer, where the maps for Animation 1 were created.

About Bob Tisdale

Research interest: the long-term aftereffects of El Niño and La Nina events on global sea surface temperature and ocean heat content. Author of the ebook Who Turned on the Heat? and regular contributor at WattsUpWithThat.
This entry was posted in The Blob. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to THE BLOB Seems to Be Disappearing at the Surface – But Will It Reemerge?

  1. tomwys1 says:

    Excellent review!!! Looks like Blob and Son of Blob have finally ended up in Davy Jones’ Locker without evidence of the Equatorial Countercurrent feeding them any dessert!!!

  2. Thanks, Bob. This is a very good article. Animation 1 is most revealing.
    This is sunlight-created warm water traveling in the Pacific Ocean, just like ENSO. The route is different, so is the timing. The possibility of ENSO feeding The Blob looks good to me.

  3. Pingback: une explication du record de température en 2015 | climat-evolution

  4. Alec aka Daffy Duck says:

    In the ‘NEWS’:
    25 January 2016
    US east coast snowstorms linked to slowdown of Atlantic current

    The record snowfall that paralysed much of the east coast of the US on the weekend could be partly due to a slowing of the Atlantic currents that transport heat northwards towards Greenland and Europe…..

    Ocean temperatures just off the east coast have been warming even faster than global temperatures, Stefan Rahmstorf of Potsdam University in Germany pointed out in a blog post on Sunday….
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2075131-us-east-coast-snowstorms-linked-to-slowdown-of-atlantic-current/

    This reminded me of:

    Change in North Atlantic Circulation [NASA, July 18, 2001]

    A NASA satellite confirms that overturning in the North Atlantic Ocean—a process where surface water sinks and deep water rises due to varying water densities—speeds up and slows down by 20 to 30 percent over 12- to 14-year cycles. Scientists previously believed that a change of this magnitude would take hundreds of years, rather than close to a decade….
    http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=1599

  5. Pingback: January 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  6. Pingback: March 2016 Update of Global Temperature Responses to 1997/98 and 2015/16 El Niño Events | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  7. Pingback: March 2016 Update of Global Temperature Responses to 1997/98 and 2015/16 El Niño Events | Watts Up With That?

  8. Pingback: February 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  9. Pingback: March 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  10. Pingback: April 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  11. Pingback: June 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  12. Pingback: July 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  13. Pingback: August 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  14. Pingback: September 2016 Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomaly Update | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  15. Pingback: Deep Ocean Warming in Degrees C | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  16. Pingback: Deep Ocean Warming in Degrees C |

Leave a comment